Access Histories and Looking Forward; a quasi-quantitaive analysis of the Film Industry and Disabled Representation

By Justin Svarc

Movie posters acquired from: https://www.movieposterdb.com/

Intro: 0-3:45

Movie Reflections: 3:45-34:21

Historical Reflection/Moving Forward: ~34:30-42:35

Motivating Questions/Criterion:

  1. Authenticity and Accuracy of Portrayal:
  • Accuracy of Depiction: Are the portrayed disabilities consistent with real-world medical, psychological, or social experiences?
  • Complexity of Character: Does the character with a disability have a well-rounded personality, goals, and flaws beyond their disability?
  • Nuance Over Stereotypes: Is the portrayal free from common stereotypes (e.g., the “inspirational hero,” “bitter recluse,” or “burden” tropes)?
  1. Casting and Representation:
  • Actors with Disabilities: Is the role played by an actor with the same or a similar disability, thereby providing authentic representation?
  • Opportunity and Inclusion: Does the production show evidence of inclusive casting processes and advisory input from the disability community?
  1. Role in the Narrative:
  • Agency and Autonomy: Does the disabled character have their own agency, make meaningful decisions, and influence the plot rather than just serving as a device for another character’s growth?
  • Integration into the Story: Is the character’s disability just a side note or essential for understanding their perspective in a way that adds depth to the narrative?
  • Range of Relationships: Does the character engage in a variety of relationships (family, friends, colleagues) that reflect the full breadth of human experience?
  1. Contextual Sensitivity and Social Environment:
  • Accessibility Depicted: Are realistic accessibility issues, accommodations, and barriers represented (e.g., sign language interpretation, ramps, assistive technology)?
  • Intersectionality: Does the portrayal acknowledge how other aspects of the character’s identity (gender, race, culture) intersect with their disability?
  1. Impact and Reception:
  • Community Feedback: Have members of the disabled community responded positively to the portrayal, or highlighted inaccuracies and harmful elements?
  • Avoidance of Exploitation: Is the character’s disability used merely as a plot device for shock value, pity, or a simplistic inspirational message?
  1. Contributions of Disabled Voices in Production:
  • Consultation and Advisors: Were disability consultants or advocacy groups involved in the scriptwriting, production, or direction process?
  • Behind-the-Scenes Representation: Did people with disabilities have creative control or significant input in shaping how disability is portrayed?
[Pictured above is a graph of the mean scores for each movie (out of 5) vs time. Overplotted is a line of best fit, showing an upward trend]
[Pictured above is a list of histograms for each criteria for each movie]

[Pictured above is a spreadsheet outlining the scores for each movie]

Author